|
ToxiPharm LLC
ToxSignal
Clinical Toxicology Intelligence
|
Issue
#10
July 2026
|
|
|
|
Hi *|FNAME|*,
The fentanyl supply keeps adding new pharmacology faster than withdrawal protocols can keep up. Medetomidine is the newest example: a potent α2-adrenergic agonist that DEA seizure data shows rising from 247 reports in 2023 to over 8,000 in 2025, producing a distinct withdrawal syndrome that COWS will not capture and buprenorphine alone will not control. That clinical gap is this issue's lead.
Also this issue: the 7-OH kratom temporary scheduling comment period closes July 31, the DEA marijuana rescheduling hearing concluded on schedule July 15, and a major surveillance study from JAMA Network Open documents where xylazine is and where it is going in the national fentanyl supply.
|
|
|
◆ Drug Trend Spotlight
|
MEDETOMIDINE / EMERGING ADULTERANT
|
Medetomidine Withdrawal Begins Within 4 to 6 Hours. COWS Will Not Catch It. Buprenorphine Alone Will Not Treat It.
Medetomidine is an α2-adrenergic agonist found with increasing frequency in the illicit fentanyl supply. Its active enantiomer is dexmedetomidine, the same compound used for ICU sedation. DEA law-enforcement seizure reports rose from 247 in 2023 to over 8,000 in 2025, and the DEA named medetomidine explicitly in its May 2026 public safety advisory alongside xylazine, nitazenes, and cychlorphine. In some regional samples, it is now appearing more frequently than xylazine.
Regular use produces physiologic α2-receptor dependence. When the drug is stopped, the result is rebound sympathetic activation: agitation, tremors, hypertension, tachycardia, diaphoresis, and severe nausea and vomiting that is often refractory to standard antiemetics. Onset is typically 4 to 6 hours after the last dose, substantially earlier than opioid withdrawal. The clinical picture can look like moderate opioid withdrawal on COWS, but the vital sign abnormalities are disproportionate to the score, and buprenorphine induction does not resolve the autonomic symptoms.
First-line management is α2-agonist replacement: oral or transdermal clonidine, often at doses above labeled recommendations. When nausea and vomiting prevent enteral therapy or enteral therapy fails, IV dexmedetomidine is required, at infusion rates that can exceed standard ICU sedation protocols. Concurrent opioid withdrawal and any other substance withdrawal must be treated separately on top of the α2-agonist regimen. Two 2026 publications from emergency medicine and pharmacy describe the clinical presentation and management in detail, and the case series and management data are new enough that most OTPs and emergency departments have not had time to update their protocols.
|
Why it matters
If a patient with fentanyl use disorder presents to intake or an emergency department 4 to 8 hours after last use with agitation, tremors, and autonomic instability that does not match their COWS score, suspect medetomidine co-dependence. Initiating buprenorphine without α2-agonist coverage will not resolve the withdrawal. Clonidine at above-label doses is first-line; escalate to IV dexmedetomidine if enteral therapy fails. Programs that have not yet reviewed their withdrawal management protocols for α2-agonist co-treatment should do so now.
|
Zimmerman DE, et al. Presentation and management of acute medetomidine withdrawal. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2026. doi:10.1093/ajhp/zxag141 · Lynch MJ, et al. Emergence of medetomidine in the illicit drug supply. Ann Emerg Med. 2026;87(6):709-716. · DEA Public Safety Advisory, May 12, 2026.
|
|
|
|
|
◆ Regulatory & Policy Update
| |
Comment Period Closes: July 31, 2026
7-OH Kratom Temporary Scheduling: Comment Period Closes July 31. Effective Date Expected August 2026.
The DEA's July 1 Notices of Intent to temporarily place concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and three synthetic analogs into Schedule I carry a 30-day public comment period closing July 31. The temporary scheduling order is expected to take effect in August 2026 barring a hearing request that substantially delays the timeline. Natural kratom leaf preparations remain outside federal scheduling.
For OTPs, drug courts, and testing programs: the clock is running. If your program uses mitragynine immunoassay testing, now is the time to confirm what your laboratory reports for kratom-positive specimens, how your MRO or program will handle a Schedule I classification, and whether your policy language distinguishes enhanced products from leaf kratom. Standard immunoassays do not make that distinction analytically; LC-MS/MS with 7-OH quantitation is required.
|
| |
Update: July 15, 2026
DEA Marijuana Rescheduling Hearing Concluded July 15. Watch for Post-Hearing DEA Guidance on Rulemaking Timeline.
The DEA administrative hearing on proposed marijuana rescheduling from Schedule I to Schedule III concluded on July 15 per the court-ordered schedule. The hearing closed the evidentiary record; a final rule requires separate DEA action and additional rulemaking. For drug testing programs, a Schedule III classification does not automatically change federal workplace testing mandates or program-level marijuana prohibitions. Watch for post-hearing DEA guidance indicating the projected rulemaking timeline.
|
|
|
|
|
◆ Science Worth Reading
|
RETROSPECTIVE SURVEILLANCE STUDY + COMMENTARY
Xylazine Positivity Is Rising Nationally in Fentanyl-Positive UDT Specimens. Concentration Is Falling. Both Findings Matter.
A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 42,307 fentanyl-positive urine drug test specimens (LC-MS/MS, March 2023 through September 2025, Millennium Health co-authors) found that xylazine co-detection rates are rising in both the East and West: from 11.1% to 19.6% in the East, and from effectively zero to 13.5% in the West. At the same time, xylazine concentrations in co-positive specimens are falling in the East (median: 61.8 to 24.0 ng/mg creatinine). The paired JAMA Network Open commentary interprets this as xylazine diluting into a larger fraction of the fentanyl supply rather than retreating from it.
The study also found xylazine 79% less likely in the West than the East in adjusted analysis, and strongly associated with heroin co-positivity and higher fentanyl concentrations, suggesting the distribution pattern remains tied to specific supply networks even as geography expands. A companion systematic review (PMID 42417934, Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2026) confirms fentanyl co-detection in 98 to 100% of fatal xylazine intoxication cases.
|
My Take
The falling concentration alongside rising positivity is the most clinically important data point here. It means xylazine is showing up in more patients, not fewer, even as the per-specimen amount drops. If your program is in the West or in a region that has not yet seen xylazine, this data shows it is arriving, not stabilizing. The practical implication for wound care protocols, naloxone dosing expectations, and withdrawal management readiness is the same regardless of region: if your patients use fentanyl, xylazine co-exposure is part of the clinical picture now.
|
Sugarman OK, Marks C, Whitley P, et al. Xylazine-fentanyl positivity and concentration in urine drug tests. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(7):e2622473. PMID 42424081. · Childerhose JE. Using urine drug testing to track xylazine-fentanyl copositivity. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(7):e2622481. PMID 42424085.
|
|
|
|
From Bill
"Medetomidine and xylazine are different compounds with different mechanisms, but they point to the same problem: the drug supply has been running ahead of clinical infrastructure for years, and the gap keeps widening. COWS was designed around opioid physiology. It was not designed to detect α2-receptor dependence, and it will not. The xylazine data shows positivity rising in regions that thought they had more time. Neither of these is a future problem. They are a present one, and most of the tools we use every day were built before either of them existed in the supply."
Dr. William Bundy Jr., PharmD
Clinical Toxicologist & Consultant · ToxiPharm LLC
|
|
ToxiPharm LLC
Clinical toxicology consulting, expert review, UDT interpretation, and Tox In Focus clinical references.
toxipharm.org
|
|
Clinical Disclaimer
Content in this newsletter is intended for clinical reference and educational purposes for use by qualified clinicians, medical review officers, and drug program administrators. It does not represent an all-inclusive review of available evidence. Clinical data, regulatory guidance, and laboratory standards evolve; readers should verify current requirements with applicable authorities. Content in this newsletter does not constitute medical, legal, or regulatory advice and should not replace independent clinical judgment. ToxiPharm LLC makes no warranties regarding completeness or applicability in all clinical situations. © 2026 ToxiPharm LLC · toxipharm.org
|
|
ToxiPharm LLC · Clinical Toxicology & Regulatory Consulting
ToxSignal is a clinical toxicology newsletter from ToxiPharm LLC. Subscribe at toxipharm.org.
All ToxSignal issues
·
ToxiPharm home
*|HTML:LIST_ADDRESSLINE|*
Update preferences
·
Unsubscribe
|
|